|
|
|
|
|
by DennisP
1078 days ago
|
|
The judge referenced the Howey case, saying that just because you have an investment contract involving an orange grove, that doesn't mean the orange grove itself is a security. A security is a contract, not just anything that people trade around in a speculative way. William Hinman of the SEC said much the same thing in 2018: https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speech-hinman-061418 |
|
> A security is a contract, not just anything that people trade around in a speculative way.
The scary thing IMO is that I think if you had enough big money trading bottlecaps or baseball cards, you'd quickly find them being considered a security.
But words have to mean something. Things can't just be a "security" because they make the government feel insecure.