|
|
|
|
|
by otoburb
1078 days ago
|
|
>>[...] what changes should we expect to see in the short term? The article mentions that since the company definitively sold unregistered securities to hedge funds and sophisticated buyers (without registering with the SEC), a jury will now/soon need to "decide whether or not Garlinghouse or Larson aided in the company's violation of the law." Seems pretty clear cut that the company, and it's executives, will have further problems to tackle in the near future. >>This is supposed to be pretty huge. This could become much bigger if the SEC uses this enforcement as an example reference case for future actions against other token projects that followed a similar playbook over the past several years, assuming the case is kicked further up the court hierarchy on appeal. |
|
There is no other project, not even a close one, who sold tokens worth almost $1b rewarding their execs, while offering no value whatsoever.
This is not a win for the SEC, this is the case they truly couldn't lose. Yes, they didn't lose everything but that was also not possible to begin with