[epimenov]

It makes sense really. About a week ago there was “code red” storm in the Netherlands, and first phone alarm contained something along the lines of “for more details see this Twitter account”.

Then they removed any mention of twitter from from the second message.

[CrampusDestrus]

1. if the tweet was from someone outside of the government then creating a mastodon instance does not make any sense

2. if the tweet was from the government then why couldn't they also put up something on a webpage on their own sites?

[neogodless]

The source of the tweet isn't the issue at play.

The tweet / Twitter is the issue.

A Mastodon instance is something the issuer of the message controls. Twitter is not.

Web sites don't "notify" people of content, but social media does.

[nobody9999]

>2. if the tweet was from the government then why couldn't they also put up something on a webpage on their own sites?

IIUC, they did. That website being https://social.overheid.nl/

Or am I missing something?

[seti0Cha]

Doesn't sound like they needed a microblogging platform, just a web page that could be easily updated. Their use of Twitter in the first place would appear to be the crux of the problem.

[mcluck]

Twitter has a built in notification system. People can subscribe to get alerts from it. Theoretically people can do that with RSS but, let's be honest, most people don't use RSS. I saw in another comment that they do have an RSS feed though if that's your cup of tea