[kelnos]

> Advertising is inherently immoral and it's our moral obligation to drive advertisers into bankruptcy.

I agree with this on principle, but in reality I wonder how we'll pay for content online if this were to happen.

Micropayments will never be a thing, and subscriptions don't make sense for random one-off videos or articles.

[hughesjj]

> Micropayments will never be a thing

Why not?

I'd love to see something like "I donate xx CPU cycles upon viewing this content" or something. Computebis a resource, same with networking, and there's already a lot of them demanded by shitty ad platforms.

I'd much rather donate those cycles to BOINC or hell, even ETH over ads

[robertlagrant]

Isn't that just gating websites with crypto payments?

[kerkeslager]

Cryptocurrencies would be an extremely poor way to implement micropayments, as their high transaction fees make them inefficient and their fluctuations in price make them unsuitable for payment in general.

The banking system moves at glacial speed, but I do believe we'll see banking plugins integrated with browsers at some point.

[hughesjj]

That would be gating websites with contributing to a crypto mining pool, although crypto microtransactions are indeed a way the web could evolve to handle non ad payments, and I'm surprised (but also kinda thankful) that the web 3.0 people never pushed that possibility.

Right now, I'm saying that compute is useful. If you've ever used BOINC or folding@home, you've seen the "download some data, do some work, upload the data" paradigm in action.

Idk. Right now, the only paradigms I'm seeing are "paywall, totally free, or sell your data" for accessing web content. I wish there was another alternative of "sell my computer" or "sell my bandwidth" (like maybe acting as a cache for can). I get those are easier to abuse, but I'd still love to at least see some content provider exploring such options.