|
|
|
|
|
by 300bps
1068 days ago
|
|
I think using AI tools to generate derivative works could place the user (Not OpenAI, etc) in rightful legal jeopardy if they distribute or sell those works I'm not sure I understand this. It is OpenAI that is scraping the copyrighted works, packaging them up into a derivative work and selling access to it. If a user never enters a prompt asking ChatGPT to create a new ASOIAF book, pieces of those previous copyrighted books are still in OpenAI's model and available for sale by OpenAI. Chat-GPT the LLM itself is the derivative work that OpenAI is selling access to. |
|
I mean, lets say I am a storywriter and I have an exceptional memory when reading books, and you buy access to talk to me to get story ideas (as a human being, no API). Lets say I also read ASOIAF. Are you telling me that anything I write that mentions winter is now intellectual property of GRRM?
In my eyes your idea of derivative work can fuck right off. Pieces of those of that copyright are also in my mind, but I give no ownership, nor any privilege's to said book writers. IP holders do not get all the benefit of free data in society, then hold the rest of us hostage.