|
|
|
|
|
|
by smarterclayton
1073 days ago
|
|
|
In general, the intent here is to leave open room for just that. dependsOn was proposed during the kep review but deferred. But because init containers and regular containers share the same behavior and shape, and differ only on container restart policy, we are taking a step towards “a tree of container node” without breaking forward or backward compatibility. Given the success of mapping workloads to k8s, the original design goal was to not take on that complexity originally, and it’s good to see others making the case for bringing that flexibility back in. |
|
|