[mrighele]

Don't know about OP, but for me it doesn't have to be something "amazing and world changing", but it should be something that makes a positive impact on the society.

For example I work in healthcare and I think that the software that I write positively affects both doctors and patients, even though it is not about a world-changing novel idea. If I were to work for Meta though (just to make an example), I wouldn't be thrilled at the idea that I am optimizing for addiction, and even if I weren't working on the core business of the company, but instead on the latest and greatest web framework, I would be still working for a company that (in my opinion) totals a negative contribution to our society. The motivation is not the same for me.

Now, in the case of Web3 and crypto, people are usually either on the "the best thing since the discover of fire" camp, or in the "a wasteland of frauds and Ponzi schemes", so in fact the dichotomy between "believing in it" and "despising it" is not really wrong...

[JohnFen]

> it doesn't have to be something "amazing and world changing", but it should be something that makes a positive impact on the society.

I agree, that's why I was asking. What the commenter meant makes a pretty large difference.