|
|
|
|
|
by dcow
1073 days ago
|
|
> What you seem to be pushing for is the much weaker interpretation that they'll get better at all, which is well, pretty obviously true. But that doesn't mean squat, so I doubt that's what you are saying. I mean this is what I was saying. I just don't think that the technology has to become hallucination-free to be useful. So my bad if I didn't catch the implicit assumption that "any hallucination is a dealbreaker so why even care about security" angle of the post I initially responded to. My take is simply just that "these things are going to be used more and more as they improve so we better start worrying about supply chain and provenance sooner than later". I strongly doubt hallucination is going to stop them from being used despite the skeptics, and I suspect hallucination is a problem of lack of context moreso than innate shortcomings, but I'm no expert on that front. And I'm someone who's been asked to try and add AI to a product and had the effort ultimately fail because the model hallucinated at the wrong times... so I well understand the dynamics. |
|