|
|
|
|
|
by bryans
1079 days ago
|
|
> nobody has ever been sued or prosecuted simply for downloading, acquiring, or possessing illegally acquired copyrighted works Everyone who was sued by the RIAA was done so for possessing the music in a publicly accessible method. Distribution was never actually proven in any of the cases (including the high profile losses). Defendants who argued that accessibility does not qualify as distribution actually won their cases. Most who argued against the validity of the evidence acquisition also won their cases. |
|