|
|
|
|
|
by serf
1071 days ago
|
|
>This article frames the problem as if the value proposition of the science and the satellites is remotely similar. This couldn’t be farther from the truth these kind of world-consequence decisions are supposed to be weighed and judged by The People In Power, rather than justified after the fact. Yes, telecoms is important; they could have justified that importance before a tribunal of people affected by the installation of the fleet. What happened instead? They did what they want, were hit with complaints, and justified the existence afterwards by A) minimizing the impact of the science (absolutely unknown and unpredictable, by the way), much like what you're doing, and B) expounded on the absolute importance of global telecom coverage (a little bit more know-able.) That's not an appropriate order of events for something that could have prolonged effects on an entire sector of research. |
|