[NX9mqsSv8]

Contrarians run against the grain of common thought, not censors. It is precisely the value of censored ideas which necessitates their censorship. That is, were they allowed to persist they would become accepted but for the censorship.

[Timon3]

Let's say we're in an astrophysics forum. Flat earthers keep coming into other topics and posting about how astrophysicists are all wrong, and flat earth is true. According to you that means flat earthers are correct and astrophysicists are wrong. Do you see where your logic breaks down?

[NX9mqsSv8]

I see that you’re intimidated by flat earthers.

[giantrobot]

Of all the possible takes that is, charitably, the dumbest. Your basic assertion is that contrarians are always right which begs the question that all orthodoxy must be a conspiracy.

Sometimes contrarians are right about things. But when they are they bring receipts. They have evidence, repeatable experiments, falsifiable hypotheses, and general academic rigor.

Flat Earthers aren't intimidating to anyone. They're tiring. Like all good conspiracy theories Flat Earth conspiracy theories are unfalsifiable. The Flat Earthers' lack of evidence is defended by them as evidence of some sort of orthodox conspiracy. Evidence contrary to their stupid ideas, including empirical observations, are also just labeled as some orthodox conspiracy.

It's not edgy, funny, or even interesting. It's just fucking stupid. It's a handful of bad faith trolls and a lot of scientifically illiterate boobs that decided to wrap their identities around Internet memes.

[Timon3]

Would you like to try seriously engaging with my previous message?

In case you think this was a good or logical response - I brought up a counter argument. You should try to engage with this argument instead of pointing back at your previous argument and extrapolating from there.