|
|
|
|
|
by evandale
1069 days ago
|
|
Am I high right now? I think you're selectively ignoring parts of the comment. It's 13 words: "This seems like a learning opportunity. Or a Darwinian opportunity. Either way, self-solving." You're turning the comment into 3 words: "Darwinian opportunity ... [which is] self-solving" Small reminder that on HN you are supposed to steelman comments when you reply, not strawman. Clearly those 3 words refers to the death of the person, but you can't ignore the remaining 10 words and say the entire comment was about eugenics. So which of the 13 words am I ignoring that you aren't? Also natural selection and killing off dumb people who are already alive is not eugenics. It's either epigenetics or genocide but like I said in a previous comment: eugenics is used to select fitness _before birth_ not after. |
|
Spektorowski, Alberto; Ireni-Saban, Liza (2013). Politics of Eugenics: Productionism, Population, and National Welfare
https://web.archive.org/web/20211019203011/https://books.goo...
(emphasis mine)
After birth for non-sterile individuals is before birth for their progeny.