|
|
|
|
|
by lmeyerov
1077 days ago
|
|
We also do platform & customer work there (cool pipelines to feed louie.ai or real-time headless versions), and agreed those pipelines have simple uses of LLM where langchain is mostly useful just for a vendor neutrality. Think BYO LLM as it is now a zoo. Basically apache nifi or spark streaming with simple LLM & vector DB call outs. Our harder work here is more at the data engineering level. But....a lot of our louie.ai work happens for less trivial scenarios where it isn't just the ETL NLP 2.0 tier . That logic is much more complicated, so structured programming abstractions matter a LOT more for AI-style business logic. Think talk to your data and generate on-the-fly analytics pushdown with an interactive data viz UI. That's.. a lot of code. |
|
That said, langchain is really inefficient and I often find I can re-implement the pieces I need much faster than dealing with langchain's bugs and performance issues.