|
|
|
|
|
by JustBreath
1071 days ago
|
|
> Only until the bar stops existing. At which point you are STILL not responsible for any liability. For example if the bar gets sued, you don't lose your home, car, etc... And in most countries, would receive unemployment that was at least partially paid for by the business in advance. Notice again though - just like the gold mine - without the infrastructure you can't extract any value at all from your ability to pour drinks. Wolff is about as bad faith as actors get. |
|
Uh, you lose your car and home when you can't pay for it due to the bar stopping existing. So you are liable in the sense that your entire income disappears due to this event. It takes a certain kind of boneheadedness to not see this.
> without the infrastructure you can't extract any value at all
I'm not sure what your point here is, all you've done is point out the obvious reason this system can even exist in the first place. Congratulations? If it weren't the case, people would just work and get the money directly and we wouldn't be having this conversation.
I'll just ignore your baseless/citationless assertion at the end there.