[danudey]

People would definitely resist the idea of not being able to spend their money the way they want. That's the whole point of capitalism, and these people made their fortunes thank to capitalism so obviously capitalism is correct.

The core fundamental issue I see a lot of is that your net worth defines your value. People with more money have more inherent value across the board, and people with less have less. Rich people have an outsized effect on society because people look at their bank balance and see how much money they've made and immediately think that their success came from being an exceptional specimen of humanity.

If we could ditch the cult of personality and the "rich makes right" attitude and actually looked at the behavior of billionaires, we'd see that these people are almost universally unhinged from reality, making baseless claims and assertions, changing social or political affiliations as soon as the group they support doesn't support them unconditionally, avoiding paying taxes as much as possible and then turning around and performing "philanthropy" by paying for a new library or wing of a museum to be named after them. They complain that the government is subsidizing health care when taking billions in government subsidies just so they can turn a bigger profit, which people then attribute to their skill and worth as a person and not their leveraging of their fortune for political gain.

[mwl2306]

>we'd see that these people are almost universally unhinged from reality, making baseless claims and assertions, changing social or political affiliations as soon as the group they support doesn't support them unconditionally, avoiding paying taxes as much as possible

This sounds like a normal person. So the problem is that they're plagued by the same biases and shortcomings as the un-monied, but via their wealth are able to inflict their flaws upon us on a vast scale?