[cochne]

What is unscientific about the article?

[AndrewKemendo]

It hasn’t been reproduced and does not offer any mechanism for deterministic prediction of future reproduction.

[leonheld]

>It hasn’t been reproduced

What? It has to start somewhere, doesn't it? Also, it clearly offers a basis for probabilistic analysis for future studies. How is this not science?

[xkcd1963]

We should make a hard distinction between science and social science.

[anigbrowl]

The first time any experiment is done it hasn't been reproduced. The SI provides detailed information on experiment design, you're free to undertake your own reproduction effort.