[CyberDildonics]

This person has claimed that video games like starcraft won't be playable in the future due to power constraints and that 10 gigabit networking is impossible due to using too much power (no explanation for why it already exists). They have also claimed that 2012 atom CPUs are the pinnacle of CPU design so I wouldn't invest much into thinking you will get a real explanation.

[bullen]

I already told you to have power backup for 24+ hours for what can saturate 10Gb/s you need more than ~8x 15kg lead-acid batteries = Not practical.

25W Atom 14nm CPU is the best middle ground between 80W Xeon and 15W Jetson Nano. It is what you need to load balance saturation of 1Gb/s = Final decentralized node.

StarCraft might be playable, StarCraft 2 however will be a privilege.

Get your facts straight!

[CyberDildonics]

Nothing you said here makes any sense at all. People are out there using 10 gigabit networking. There are benchmarks that show how slow the atom cpus are. There no power shortage. Why do you believe these ideas?

[bullen]

You have zero arguments.

I'm talking about the future, not now.

Please link to the Atom benchmarks that show how slow they are on relevant server tasks. I remind you I'm talking about 14nm with 8-16 cores.

[CyberDildonics]

To be clear here, you are predicting the future and in that future there is for some reason not enough power to play a game from 12 years ago, even though it can be played on a 65W AMD chip. You realize that refrigerators, space heaters and air conditioners take about 10x-30x the amount of power you are saying won't be available in the future right?

The burden of proof is on the people who make the (ridiculous) claims.

[bullen]

Energy is scarce and money is infinite.

We had $1/KWh in EU this winter.

With that price you are paying almost $1 per day of running your 65W computer.

That's $30 per month just to keep the computer gaming during daytime.

There is no roof for how high prices or inflation can go.

Other gear are more important than entertainment, people will not consume games when they are hungry or cold (though computers help with that somewhat).

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that nuclear is heating the planet more than CO2, the efficiency of nuclear is 35% so for every KWh of electricity you heat the planet with 3 KWh.

3KWh that the planet has to radiate into space that did not get added during any time before.

We are slowly boiling the planet, like frogs in a casserole.

Eventually you wont have the energy, money or time to play anything.

[CyberDildonics]

Energy is scarce

No it is not, especially in the context of running home computers. Why do you think that?

money is infinite

No it is not.

We had $1/KWh in EU this winter.

Average price is about 0.22 Here is some actual information.

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php...

That's $30 per month just to keep the computer gaming during daytime.

No it is not. 65W is the max amount of power. 10 hours a day every day at max is still a little over $4 per month. TVs, refrigerators electric heating and air conditioning are all 20x the impact of an average computer.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that nuclear is heating the planet more than CO2

You should not go out on a limb for anything. You should read and stop guessing.

Where are you getting your ideas? Source something, link anything that supports what you are saying.