|
|
|
|
|
by Mizoguchi
1074 days ago
|
|
I don't see in the paper they adjusted by family size. They mention socioeconomic status but that isn't the same thing. Would it be possible people living in urban areas close to parks have less kids or no children at all? Usually real state closer to parks within the city permiter are much more expensive, the same money buys you less square footage. I have done my own study with 7 siblings in my family half with children and I can assure you having kids adds at least 3 years of biological age per kid. |
|
It's not a huge difference: 2 additional years in men, 1.5 in women; but it's significant enough[1].
---
[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28292784/