[dimmke]

I adopted Tailwind but I did it in I think a way that would make the creator of Tailwind crazy. But it’s for a project only I work on, so meh.

I’ve found that even with components that can do their own scoping, it becomes easier to use a semantic class name. Because I’ll create a component, and then later want to use it in a different way I didn’t originally consider. If you don’t have a semantic class name applying overrides becomes difficult.

What I end up doing is designing things in browser, because it’s so quick. And then I slowly abstract it out into a class with @apply rules, but I have my own way that I like to group them. So like one line will be for typography, one will be for layout. It’s so much less verbose than regular CSS I find it really easy to read and change quickly.

But I also know CSS really well, so I can quickly scan the shorthand and understand exactly what it’s doing. Tailwind is the first time I’ve ever willingly used a CSS framework because it just clicks for me, but I don’t use it the way it’s “meant” to be used. Also the defaults for things like text sizing etc… help keep me standardized somewhat. It reduces the number of options and in a good 70% of cases prevents me from spending hours obsessively changing the first or second decimal point of a number and trying to decide if something looks better being 1 pixel to the left (or sometimes a half or quarter pixel )

So if you have OCD, consider Tailwind!

[afiori]

IMHO the secret of tailwind is that it is not really a CSS framework, it is a different way to author CSS.

The only real difference is that you do not use >, +, or *

[dimmke]

I think it’s an interesting question - what should the goal of a CSS “framework” be?

Because in the past, CSS struggled with achieving basic common layouts without using hacks. That’s why Bootstrap and its grid system were so popular.

But that’s not an issue anymore. Tailwind doesn’t hide much behind abstractions. So many times as a programmer, I’ve been forced to adopt tooling that promises to make something easier, only to have issues with the tooling, or it having its own learning curve etc… outweigh any benefit.

Tailwind is just easy, and it’s the first time I’ve encountered something that actually rewards underlying knowledge instead of trying to prevent the user from needing it.