Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Aeolun 1075 days ago
Why is this the case? Wouldn’t having more than one paper proving/discovering the same thing be good for confidence in either of them?
2 comments

Its sort of a mix of a lot of small things - 1) The coming conferences will be flooded with LLM analysis, so the space will be heavily saturated and more difficult to find a significant contribution; 2) LLMs are a new model that you might need to include in your analysis, which means learning about and becoming familiar with them; 3) your work might get overshadowed because its now obsolete in the land of LLMs

A slight equivalent I can think about would be the emergence of neural networks. When I was working on my Masters on face recognition, neural networks were not the major force they are now. Facial landmarks used a combination of haar features and edge detection. These methods weren't outright abandoned, but if NNs had taken off during my research, then I would have had to restart my work.

In theory yes, in practice many journals are only interested in work with a clear novelty factor.