Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ntumlin 1080 days ago
This is nonsense, it’s obvious what type of safety OP meant. I have no idea what could be irresponsible about not including contrived, ridiculous scenarios.

It’s like saying he also should have accounted for the possibility fairies will turn you into a newt if you edit a gene, or into a rabbit, or if a wizard will turn you into a newt. You can make up an infinite amount of this bs.

1 comments

That's a pretty good point. We can make up an infinite number of contrived scenarios and it is obvious from context what type of safety is meant.