|
|
|
|
|
by 3np
1082 days ago
|
|
Surprisingly enough, if your primary motivation for doing this is to save system resources, it might be misguided. ubuntu-base docker images are slimmer than contemporary debian slim, even, though debian seems to have been closing the gap recently - I recall the discrepancy as larger. Below shows image sizes in MB as of today: docker.io/debian:bullseye 123.4
docker.io/debian:bookworm 115.7
docker.io/debian:bullseye-slim 80.1
docker.io/ubuntu:22.04 76.6
docker.io/debian:bookworm-slim 74.2
docker.io/ubuntu:23.04 69.4
This is specific to docker images, while default ubuntu server or desktop releases are otherwise very much a bloat-fest compared to debian. |
|