|
|
|
|
|
|
by firstlink
1078 days ago
|
|
|
The government will never comply with this order. Also, periodic reminder that articles which don't link (or even quote) primary sources are propaganda, not journalism. Here's an article which does link and quote: https://reason.com/volokh/2023/07/04/july-4-injunction-bars-.... Most notably, the order does not, as TFA claims, include a blanket ban on communication with specific carveouts. Only specific kinds of communication are banned, and the carveouts are on top of that. |
|
|
As you note, there is a helluva carve out. It's also incredibly frustrating to look for news on these cases. The heuristic I've had to use since 2016 or so is if there is no link to the primary source, I am being lied to.
>IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction … is DENIED as to the following Defendants: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; U. S. Department of Treasury; U.S. Election Assistance Commission; [and] U. S. Department of Commerce
[1] https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.lawd.18...
Edit: link to the decision, which is 155 pages long and filed earlier today. (Happy 4th of July, I guess). I am strongly skeptical this journalist has actually read all of it, let alone has spent enough time to properly analyze and research it for a story.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.lawd.18...