[nonethewiser]

We really cant let OpenAI get away with calling “content moderation” ”safety”. Making sure it isnt offensive isnt a safety measure.

Everyone agrees safety from AI acting autonomously and maliciously is good. But thats not really a threat right now. Less think we need to make it “safe” by making it inoffensive. Its a tool. It should do what I want it to.

[Llamamoe]

"safety" is such a wrong term for what they're trying to achieve that it makes me wonder if it's not just a PR stunt.

[uLogMicheal]

Or doublespeak for censorship. Many will let liberties fade under the guise of safety.

[Llamamoe]

"I don't have anything to hide" will one distant day become one of the biggest cautionary tales we've ever had, I'm calling it.

[mark_l_watson]

Well said. I define ‘safe AI’ as tech that enriches human life, rather than serving as tools for controlling people at scale and and negatively impacting peoples’ lives.

I am between ankle deep, and knee deep in writing a new book “Safe For Humans AI” and I have been reading as much as possible on the subject. I am in learning mode.

Not too far off topic: I read this article [1] today and it really hits on AI, productivity, history of technology, etc.

[1] https://zhengdongwang.com/2023/06/27/why-transformative-ai-i...