|
|
|
|
|
by kemayo
1089 days ago
|
|
Article doesn't, but the study it's based on does. Recruited athletes are less-diverse than the general applicant pool: > For example, recruited athletes, legacies, and dean’s interest list applicants are all over 68% white, yet the share of non-ALDC applicants who are white is less than 41%. All other racial groups see higher representation among non-ALDC applicants and admits than in any of the corresponding ALDC applicant and admit categories. - https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26316/w263... page 16 My anecdotal understanding is that "recruited athlete" often functions as a way for rich people to get their kids in. Get your kid on an expensive-and-niche sports team in high school -- lacrosse, water polo, etc -- and that puts them into a much-smaller pool of students that can be "recruited" by the college team. |
|
75% of the US population is white, so it sounds like that group is underrepresented in athletic admissions.
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045222