|
|
|
|
|
by atoav
1085 days ago
|
|
I had a look at djot, which adresses all of the author's grievances and I must say... I don't like it. Sure, it probably is easier to parse, and maybe there are a few edge cases that it does better, but the goal of markdown is to have text that is: A) human readable and looks good without parsing it B) can be parsed and presented using different themes In djot they sacrifice a lot (e.g. we now have to insert empty lines in a nested list?!) of point A for questionable gains at point B. Guess what I as a user care more about? Markdown accepting a wide range of inputs is not a mistake, it is a feature. If that makes parsing more complex that is an acceptable side effect not a mistake. |
|
I would have tried harder to find some other way to make the grammar simple.
I haven’t seen anything else (in addition) that makes it less “human readable” though.