|
|
|
|
|
by nunez
1087 days ago
|
|
Honestly, I think Facebook and "social media" in general would be way better if they were paid services. It's easy to think that people won't pay for such an experience. I think that's naive. There are plenty of examples of people being willing to pay for a premium experience when free/cheap options are available, like these: - Apple convinced a LOT of non-audiophiles to pay $249 and $550 for Bluetooth earbuds and headphones (respectively). - OpenAI is convincing millions to pay $20/month for ChatGPT+. - Krisp makes a bunch of money over something that has a free alternative (software noise cancelling) because it's just THAT good. - Tesla convinced a LOT of people to buy a Model 3 or Model Y over the Camry or Accord they were originally going to get. I would LOVE to use Facebook or something like that but am not willing to have a non-governmental entity surveil my every move online in exchange, nor am I willing to be subjected to an experience that is constantly trying to get me addicted to using it. |
|
The 'infinite growth at all costs' model has rarely been seriously challenged, and as a result its become blase to think of a smaller scale but more stable and consistently successful business, and instead everything needs to lead towards monopolized or cartel-like "Big Tech".
It's a farce.