[gameman144]

> If the same-sex couple commissioned a website for a hetero wedding, the designer would be obligated, right?

Based on this ruling, no. The designer would be just as firmly within their rights under this ruling to say "I don't think anyone should get married, so I won't do a heterosexual wedding website", or to say "I think this person is too tall, so I don't want to make their website".

If the designer agreed to make a given website, though, then declined upon finding out that the customers were a same-sex couple (in a way that didn't change the contract at all), then that would still presumably be a case of discrimination.

[KMag]

Yes, I guess that's what I meant, but wasn't precise enough. Thanks for the correction.