|
|
|
|
|
by tiehuis
1086 days ago
|
|
I wouldn't assume that just because Andrew has written the proposal it will be accepted. There have been plenty of times where proposals from Andrew have been rejected and/or reworked. The sub-items of this task are still valuable to complete even if this overarching proposal were declined. Most of them are not being completed as a prerequisite for this proposal. There are benefits gained even without the full removal of LLVM. I can really respect the really wide-reaching views and goals of Andrew with zig and in proposals like this, even if I don't agree. |
|