I don't think they do. You might disagree but I think Altman's stance is that this will happen no matter what, so it's better for "good guys" (for some definition of that word) to take the lead to minimize the threat.
Yes, I understand his stance. I think that stance is, at best, misguided. But given how the worldcoin thing shook out, it seems to me that he doesn't have a great deal of concern over how his actions impact others, and I question his ability to judge who are the "good guys" and "bad guys". I am trying to view him in the most positive possible light here.