|
|
|
|
|
by coldtea
1092 days ago
|
|
>You aren't going to keep the subscription base without spending a ton on marketing If you do quality work, you don't need to spend a ton on marketing. And this is very livable revenue - tons of media outlets thrived on less (inflation adjusted) back in the day. The main problem is belonging to some conglomerate who doesn't care for such small profits or a business breaking even. They're an insect to them. A corporation running from a non-profit dedicated to the mission (as opposed to those greedy people), or passionate private owner(s), would have no problem to continue. |
|
Producing what National Geographic magazine does is not cheap and they have historically had much higher revenue. Nevermind that they are still continuing, just without staff writers.