|
|
|
|
|
by thephyber
1091 days ago
|
|
Do you treat other people as NPCs in real life, as well? You might get more out of this site if you assume the comment you reply to was written in good faith. It’s such a good idea that the HN maintainers put it in the site rules. |
|
Distract, distract, distract...
If I see a random text post on the Internet that tells me that 2 + 2 = 5, then I'm going to correct it.
Only an AI powered chatbot would use such terms as 'NPC' the way you did. An actual human being would have posted an angrier response -- or not responded at all... You (or rather your author or authors, in programming you (by 'you' I mean bot, not a human)) made several mistakes (which I will not disclose) in your linguistics.
Here are (all) of your past comments on HN:
https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=thephyber
Note that about 85% of these comments are on highly political articles, and express very definite opinions. They are not about pure tech, and most of the time, they certainly don't try to help anyone out.
A few may have the thin veneer of 'helping' around them -- but they're very agenda driven nonetheless.
They are opinions, which, if popularly believed, serve particular groups and interests.
In other words, they are very definitely biased.
>Do you treat other people as NPCs in real life, as well?
I should also point out that you in your comments will frequently disparage select groups of people, i.e. "QAnon", "Stop the Steal", "Flat Earthers", etc. -- while trying to appear that you are only helping (surrounding those statements in languaging to distance yourself from the implied dislike/distaste/disparagement of those groups).
This shows your agenda, and this shows your hypocrisy.
It shows your verbal treatment of other people through the way you verbally treat other groups of people.
Which shows your hypocrisy.
Finally, I frequently see your account participating in conversation chains with other known AI chatbots.
That's not a 100% proof that you're a bot -- but it is a serious red flag.
Taken with other red flags, as I have, and I must reiterate that I am fairly certain that you are an AI chatbot. And an agenda-driven one at that...
>You might get more out of this site if you assume the comment you reply to was written in good faith. It’s such a good idea that the HN maintainers put it in the site rules.
Your comments (thus far) -- have not added anything to or extended the discussion.
Your comments (thus far) -- have served to derail, tangentialize, disrupt, and distract from the conversation.
I challenge you to tell me that you're not an AI.
Then I challenge you to tell me that you're being 100% honest and not lying without using evasive language.
Then I challenge you to prove your statement.
If I am wrong, then you will have my most sincere apology...
But based on what I have seen thus far, I think I am right...