[likeabbas]

I understand, and I'm trying to explain how your options don't make sense in the context of the senators' recent actions.

I take offense to your edit. I'm not being a religious zealot saying God has to exist. If you understood anything about the US security clearance system, you would know that everyone has to undergo a rigorous psychological evaluation every 5 years to keep their Top Secret SCI clearance. You can not be unwell and be an intelligence officer at the level of Grusch. The likelihood of him being mentally unfit for that job and lying under oath to congress about these claims is extremely low. Also, If he is intentionally lying, he will go to jail.

All of that plus what the senators have recently done, we have a limited set of options for what could be the case.

[ftxbro]

> "I take offense to your edit. I'm not being a religious zealot saying God has to exist. "

I take offense to your edit that takes offense to my edit. I'm not accusing you of being a religious zealot saying God has to exist. I had even gone out of my way in my post to clarify that, in case you had a hard time understanding analogies. At this point I have to imagine that you understand my point and you are just pretending to think that I am calling you a religious zealot as an excuse to get more offended.

[likeabbas]

No, I just don’t like being compared to someone believing something blind. If Grusch was alleging that there are undisclosed programs reverse engineering other country technology, it would be taken seriously. But the subject brings stigma and that’s what needs to change. We shouldn’t be afraid to investigate these claims just because they seem incredibly outlandish.

[Jolter]

> everyone has to undergo a rigorous psychological evaluation every 5 years to keep their Top Secret SCI clearance. You can not be unwell and be an intelligence officer at the level of Grusch.

You can, for up to five years.

Assuming that the evaluation actually catches whatever illness you might have.

[likeabbas]

Are you going to assume the IC Inspector General is unwell too since they referred Grusch’s claims to congress as being both urgent and credible?

[Jolter]

I’m not saying anyone is unwell. I was commenting on the two sentences I quoted. They are not consistent with each other: the second does not follow from the first.

[likeabbas]

You’re not directly saying Grusch is unwell, but you’re certainly insinuating it. And you’re dodging the other facts, like the ICIG deeming the claims as credible and [urgent (50 U.S.C. § 3033(k)(5)(G))](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3033)

[ftxbro]

> "You can not be unwell and be an intelligence officer at the level of Grusch."

OK but I think it's more likely that he's mistaken or misinformed or unwell or lying for some other reason, than that it's aliens or a psyop.

[likeabbas]

Again, why would congress include these provisions in the next NDAA if they didn’t think Grusch’s comments held enough weight?

[ftxbro]

I'm not surprised that congress told someone to make a list or that someone might give misinformed testimony to congress. I think those are more likely than aliens or psyop.

[likeabbas]

Why are you ignoring the fact that the senators have been convinced to add provisions regarding "non-earth origin" technology. That's a significant claim

[mydudeno]

> You can not be unwell and be an intelligence officer at the level of Grusch.

My man, any number of unwell ppl have occupied high level positions. Michael Flynn is nuttier than squirrel shit. F’in lunatic Trump held the very highest office. Point to any of the crazies that are associated with either of those raging assholes and it’s nothing but mental illnesses and outright crazy goals and ideas.

[likeabbas]

This situation may be a bit different. Trump was president and the clearance system begins and ends with his authority. He dictated Flynn and Kushner receipt Top Secret SCI clearances despite them not being able to pass the background checks.