|
|
|
|
|
|
by mananaysiempre
1093 days ago
|
|
|
I don’t get it. Both readIdx_ and writeIdxCached_ are “owned” by the consumer. (That being the point of a “cached” copy.) The producer might read readIdx_ occasionally, whenever we go through the whole buffer, but otherwise only the consumers access these. So why should we avoid putting them on the same cache line? |
|
|