|
|
|
|
|
by deterministic
1096 days ago
|
|
Leaky abstractions are bad abstractions. So what you are basically saying is “don’t implement bad abstractions”. Ehhhh right. I think we can all agree to not implement bad things. There is no insight or enlightenment there IMHO. |
|
> Having said that, a lack of architectural abstractions leads to badly designed code with a WTF count reaching the heavens.
> a lack of architectural abstractions leads to spaghetti code.
> domain logic directly relying on a specific UI framework?
If we are pedantic: lack of architectural abstractions, spaghetti code, and domain logic tied to an UI can also be interpreted as simply bad, so no information in either of our posts :)
Of course, I am joking. Saying that I think leaky abstractions are bad, or you saying that no abstractions are bad is new information (it reduces uncertainty). It tells us that we think that x is bad.
We can agree that bad abstractions are bad. In this thread, abstracting to early, or having leaky abstractions or not having any abstractions are just 3 positions on the topic of what a bad abstraction is.
I bet we could much easier agree with a specific example. In my experience all "big principle" discussions improve when we focus on a specific example. Otherwise people are thinking of different scenarios.
In any case, I can think of scenarios where each of those 3 positions is right, so I do not really disagree with any of them.