| > you keep using the word objective and i'm not sure you know what that word means. I don't know if maybe English is your first language or not, but objective means "based on established fact". In other words, you don't know the criteria I've used to rank one above the other in all my comparisons, you only know that it is something based on fact.[1] > these are subjective comparisons that you are making. No, they aren't. The reasons a person may choose one option over another can be subjective. The fact that one performs better than another on a certain criteria is objective. > and different people have different subjective tastes. But I already said that: >> People have different tastes and different motivations. See? My entire point was that, even if something is objectively better than something else, people may still want the something else due to reasons of taste and motivation. [1] And, in fact, you could switch almost all of my comparisons around (except for the poor UI/UX on Macs - that comparison was restricted to only the UI/UX) just by using different criteria in the objective comparisons. |