|
|
|
|
|
by Pazzaz
1089 days ago
|
|
The source paper says: > During an experiment to produce gynogenic Russian sturgeon progeny, a negative control was initiated using non-irradiated American paddlefish sperm and eggs from the Russian sturgeon. Unexpectedly, the control cross resulted in viable hybrids. I'm not a biologist, but I guess it's the "gynogenic" part that's hard to do? |
|
> The initial goal of the study was to encourage the critically endangered sturgeon to reproduce asexually. That isn’t quite how it went.
The focus of the study was the critically endangered sturgeon.
The other species was needed since:
> in gynogenesis, the DNA of the sperm specimen isn’t supposed to transfer to the offspring.
They deliberately picked a distant species (not in the same genus, and not even in the same family) to use as a negative control. But, accidentally, their negative control group "found a way to live" (in their words)!
For the description of the American paddlefish as "endangered species", this may have come from, e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_paddlefish -
> American paddlefish are also protected under Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) meaning international trade in the species (including parts and derivatives) is regulated