[CyberDildonics]

it's not something that anyone has really done

It has been done many times.

Not only that, if you want to use a web page for a GUI, then do it by making a local web server back end and just use the web browser.

This idea that electron is somehow the only way to get cross platform GUIs is some sort of bizarre twilight zone where a bunch of people who only know javascript ignore that last three decades of software.

[tracker1]

Okay, care to name some of these many cross-platform, easy to use UI toolkits that include the accessibility that the browser has?

Also, I never said Electron was the only way... I specifically mentioned Tauri in my comment as an example of a browser renderer. And it doesn't need to use a local web server either.

[CyberDildonics]

Qt, FLTK, WxWidgets

And it doesn't need to use a local web server either.

Shipping an entire browser so someone can pop up a single window is not a positive. Again, if you want html as your interface, use html and let people use their own browser so that the entire program is 400KB instead of 400 MB

[tracker1]

Qt, open-source only or expensive licensing. C++ only bindings... wouldn't call it "easy to use"

FLTK, no accessibility features

WxWidgets, really limited theming, not even close to html+css. Cross platform compatibility is hit and miss, usually requiring a lot of one-off platform corrections.

Also, as I said, you don't need to ship the entire browser... not once, but twice... try reading slower.

[CyberDildonics]

Qt, open-source only or expensive licensing

It's LGPL, lots of programs use it like qTorrent, VLC and much more. You can make up criticisms but it has been a backbone of GUIs for decades.

FLTK, no accessibility features

What exactly do you need and do you need it for every GUI you make? If you want a web page, use a web page.

WxWidgets, really limited theming,

Suddenly theming is your deal breaker.

not even close to html+css

Thankfully, because that is often not a good way to make a GUI.

as I said, you don't need to ship the entire browser...

No, you said "it doesn't need to use a local web server either." Also 'entire web browser or not' electron programs end up being hundreds of megabytes for a simple window use hundreds of megabytes of RAM.

The bottom line here is not that electron is necessary. It is that you want to use javascript even though your users will hate it.

[mwcampbell]

> What exactly do you need and do you need it for every GUI you make?

A GUI toolkit that has no support for screen readers, or other assistive technologies that require accessibility APIs, should be a non-starter for most applications IMO. We need more options that meet that criterion without going all the way to a web page.

[tracker1]

From my original comment, "cross-platform UI toolkit that is easy to use, has all the accessibility features of the browser built in, and has a UI control toolkit as rich as say mui.com ... Support SVG as well as stylized layout similar to html+css"

So, you've failed to meet the requirements from the start.

I've also said, many times now, that you can use browser tech without an entire browser and the answer doesn't need to be electron.

[CyberDildonics]

How is electron better than a web page for accessibility?

[tracker1]

Sorry, accidentally replied under the wrong post below.

[Narishma]

Qt has been LGPL for ages. You can use it for free just fine in proprietary apps, as long as you don't modify Qt itself.

[tracker1]

Sorry, I had forgotten.