Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sureglymop 1094 days ago
Do you have experience with self-hosting Guitea? I am on to fence about going with Gitea because of the recent fork of the project (Forgejo). Seems that many contributors are now contributing mainly to Forgejo.
6 comments

The reason for the fork was that Gitea was going for-profit and the folks that forked to Forgejo felt they went about that transition in a way that eroded trust. Here's their explanation: https://blog.codeberg.org/codeberg-launches-forgejo.html
Gitea is itself a fork of gogs (Go Git Server)

it is functioning like Open Source should, there was a disagreement in how the project was run so it gets forked

This used to be more common place when projects were run by people not companies. I wish the practice would come back we need more forks in Free Software

It feels bad to "waste" the work that could have otherwise gone into highly-paid billable hours, or at least charity work on other repos that get more use.
I self host Gitea. Very reliable. Painless setup. I wish it had some sort of CI like github actions or bitbucket pipelines, but otherwise totally happy wit it.
> I wish it had some sort of CI like github actions or bitbucket pipeline

I use Gitea with Drone CI and it works pretty well: https://www.drone.io/

Some might also prefer the Woodpecker CI fork due to the license: https://woodpecker-ci.org/

I setup Drone as a part of my migration away from GitLab Omnibus and have no complaints so far: https://blog.kronis.dev/articles/goodbye-gitlab-hello-gitea-...

Here's the Drone example in particular: https://blog.kronis.dev/tutorials/moving-from-gitlab-ci-to-d...

It's been added recently. Not sure how they compare.
GitHub actions works in gittea at version 1.19
Just self host the community edition of gitlab. It's miles better than gitea. It's got ci pipelines, it's got a pretty robust issue tracker, it's got wiki pages, it'll integrate with ldap/ad for authentication, it's got a package repository for self hosting libraries, it's got releases, it's got a service desk to make email -> ticket pipelines, etc.
GitLab CE is far too heavy and requires minimum 4GB to run. Contains lots of componnents including PostgreSQL and Redis and various components and startup takes long. With Gitea I can run it with just 1GB or a raspberry pi. It includes wiki, package repositories and releases as well. ldap, service desk - these are enterprise features that I don't need.
> It's miles better than gitea.

Gitlab is a crazy setup full of services, with elaborate interdependence, absurd hardware requirements, iffy performance, and all the lack of confidence on security that comes from this (and it only ever running if you use their docker images and don't touch anything).

But yeah, it got everything.

Gitea has all these features as well, except maybe the last.
I've got Gitea running on a $5 Vultr instance and it's great.

Upgrades have been painless. Doesn't tax the server.

Was using Gitea when that fork happened and didn't see a reason to migrate. Looked very much like poor communication on the behalf of Gitea causing a misunderstanding.

I self host Gitea both on my home NAS and a DO droplet. I set up repos sync between the instances, it works flawlessly. I've moved the most of my projects off Github/Gitlab and overall I'm very happy with it.
I self-host gitea as a github backup just in case. It's pretty easy and well documented (it's a single executable and you can use sqlite for the database).