|
|
|
|
|
by jbrichter
5224 days ago
|
|
The traditional student is better educated. Presumably (s)he is motivated and interested in certain classes too. The difference is the computer student avoids doing anything (s)he doesn't feel like doing. Living according to your whims is not taking it on yourself to be responsible. Second of all, it's not like Thrun left a comfy life in the ivory tower to get with the times. The WSJ article says he was an adjunct. It's not surprising he left a dead-end job to join a startup. I'd also say that if you're not learning outside of your immediate narrow interests, you're not really learning. Is learning an 8th programming language once you already know 7 a bigger learning experience than taking a course in chemistry when you know none? Boring (to you) required classes have two purposes: to be truly educated you need breadth, and for a degree to be worth anything on the job market it should demonstrate that you can suck it up and do unpleasant tasks. If you don't care about either of those and just want to stick with what you know and like, why the hell are you in school anyway? |
|