|
|
|
|
|
by PragmaticPulp
1093 days ago
|
|
Tim Ferriss is very good at downplaying the effort and costs that go into businesses. Good for inspiring people to try, bad for actually being transparent. In this example, the (claimed) $200 production cost and $2.10 DVD cost are probably nothing relative to this large marketing cost: > piece through trade magazines The marketing costs and effort are conveniently omitted. |
|
There’s lists of publications by trade. You could buy ad space on multiple publications or individually. The model was $n per square inch of space.
The trick was finding the lists. General business magazines used to have advertisements for companies that ran/owned the lists. So it was somewhat accessible to the general public.
Cost was similar to how ad words are calculated. So the more niche you’d go the better chance you had of manageable costs (unless your niche was super expensive for some reason).
Effort is relative. Once you knew how the marketing channels worked everything else was fairly straightforward. The ads that worked were just left on autopilot. There weren’t redesigns or none of the shit that’s done today. Ads were left alone. Tracking was even rather simple. You’d have a special code, phone number, or mailbox that tied the ad to the order. Simple stuff.
You can replicate all of these today and still make a tidy sum. But you won’t do it behind a computer. Gotta go out into the wild and talk with people about all kinds.