Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by philosopher1234 1097 days ago
They're not reserved keywords. Existing/package defined min/max functions would take precedence. They have the same semantics as `append`
1 comments

You refactored your code, you think you wrote your ``min`` function, but no, it'll call the builtin one, without warning you..

I don't like this design..

The compiler will tell you if the types aren't compatible, and this is only for primitive comparable types. What `min()` implementation could you have that even does something different?
A heap?
Not too familiar with go toolchains, but I bet there's a linter that will warn you about shadowing builtins.
Yep: "variable append has same name as predeclared identifier (predeclared) go-golangci-lint"
if you have so few tests and so little code review that this matters then I am not sure what to suggest
Qt uses qMin and qMax, it may have been nice if go went with like gMin and gMax