|
|
|
|
|
by jerf
1100 days ago
|
|
If you think about it as a one-off amusement it's no big deal. This is how most people are evaluating it. But consider iterating such an interaction over the course of, say, 25 years, and comparing the person who was interacting with humans versus the one who interacted with LLMs, and any halfway sensible model of a human will show you what's dangerous about that. Yeah, the former may well have some more bumps and bruises, but on the net they're way ahead. And that's assuming the human who delegated all interaction to LLMs even made it to 25 years. This argument only holds for LLMs as they stand now; it is not a generalized argument against AI friends. (That would require a lot more work.) |
|
I do think there is higher maximum with other people. But relationships are hard. They take work and there's a decent chance you invest that work in the wrong people.
I can see a life with primarily AI social interaction being an okay life. Which is not the best it can be but also an improvement for some.