|
|
|
|
|
by hinkley
1100 days ago
|
|
That’s definitely part of the dynamic. My biggest regret with automated testing is that software used to be a triumvirate of Quality, Dev, and Management, and when dev was fucking around they had two teams hitting them, and when Management was out of control, they had everyone mad at them. Get rid of QA and it’s Us vs Them and that worked briefly at the dawn of Agile but they got wise. OP’s should replace QA at that table to rebalance the equation. But again, and as you illustrated, we have an adversarial relationship that takes a lot of across the aisle work to introduce sanity. |
|
even if you could staff a competent group, they are often left with nothing to do while the devs 'work their magic'. and suddenly its 3 months past the original 'functionally complete' deadline, and QA is given 1 week to do what they .. oh, maybe 3 days really, to do what they need to do.
when it works its irreplaceable. when it doesn't its just a lot of noise and spend and flailing.