Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by JohnsonB 5228 days ago
This article: http://money.cnn.com/2011/11/09/smallbusiness/kiva_robots/in... says that 1000 robots costs $15-20 million, not the $500 million that 500k a piece would run. Also what is there to indicate such a hefty need for engineering oversight? 20 engineers constantly overseeing the machines sounds like they are either constantly breaking down, or need a significant amount of custom programming per unit as upkeep, both of which just sounds like a quality control issue on Kiva's side. It makes sense that there's a lot of initial planning/programming for each installation, but I'd expect it to be mostly self-running after that. I would be curious about the energy needs per unit, though. They seem to be carrying around more weight per package shipped than with a human picker carrying just what goes in one package, but then again their use of energy might be more efficient than humans.
2 comments

1000 robots needing just 30 minutes of preventative maintenance per week is 500 hours of PM a week. That sounds like about the amount of PM a staff of 20 engineers can supply, once you account for admin, PTO, training, travel between robots, and doing the actual work.

Engineer does not solely mean "one who creates software".

The word you are looking for is "technician".
Well, everyone's an engineer nowadays. My company has "custom service engineers." =)
I may be old school, but I don't regard anyone as an engineer without a degree in engineering.

Other wise, they're a hacker ;-)

>I would be curious about the energy needs per unit, though.

An 180 lb person speed walking at 5 mph burns 650 Calories/hr. That's 80¢/shift in electricity.

But that's not the big savings. Humans need lights and air-conditioning – robots don't. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fdd6sQ8Cbe0#t=5m40s