|
|
|
|
|
|
by roel_v
5224 days ago
|
|
|
"The future of newspapers is more local." Well, here in Europe you're empirically being shown wrong. Local newspapers disappear the first; first step is that they're bought by a larger entity, second step is the removal of local news from them (because too expensive to write up), third step is killing them. Then, after a large brand has killed several smaller ones, they get bought by a bigger entity or go bankrupt. I'm not sure how you can say that producing a local news story is cheap. It's very expensive on a per-reader count (which is all that matter) because there are relatively few readers. If you write a national story, you can sell it to everybody in the country. If you write a local story, you can only sell it to a subset of those people. Writing about a bake off costs the same as writing about a political debate on a national topic. It's quite obvious that writing for a small audience is a lot harder to have a positive ROI than for a large audience. |
|
|
What we're starting to see is the rebirth of local community publications like non-profit donation supported pubs: http://www.newhavenindependent.org and http://www.texastribune.org.
We're also starting to see rapidly expanding for-profit groups like Community Impact. Who would have thought that relentlessly focusing on quality content would pay off?
It's often easier to get local advertisers to buy into the idea that they'll be targeting a local audience. Why wouldn't your bake-off article example be sponsored by the local grocery store or law firm? Which local advertiser wants to appear next to the national political debate article?