[snvzz]

>Averages over large bodies of code do not matter

>Compiler output does not matter

>1987 paper

>RISC-V encoding "close enough to MIPS"

>disprove the claim that "RISC-V code is significantly smaller"

F for effort.

[userbinator]

1987 paper

Did you even look at the link?

Neither shilling nor trolling is welcome here. Is there a relationship you haven't disclosed with RISC-V?

[snvzz]

>Did you even look at the link?

Yes, I did.

>RISC-V encoding "close enough to MIPS"

... while pointing at MIPS-X, 1987. Deranged.

>Is there a relationship you haven't disclosed with RISC-V?

Are you projecting? I have noticed a pattern in your appearances whenever a discussion about RISC-V pops up.