[edgyquant]

But as you just said… it was leaked

[Havoc]

If you want to consider filling in a form and downloading it a "leak" then yeah it was leaked. I wouldn't call it that but semantics I guess

[Uehreka]

I think people are referring to the part where someone made a torrent so you could get it without filling in the form as the leak.

[Havoc]

I see. Thanks for explaining. Yeah I guess that re-distribution was a little rogue and could perhaps be called a leak. I personally dislike that interpretation but I can see it.

[edgyquant]

No it’s the part after that where the torrent was leaked to the public that I’d consider a leak.

[JumpCrisscross]

It was "leaked."

They wanted to distribute it. But they couldn't, politically. So it "leaked."

[bick_nyers]

You can tell by Mark's wording and body language when he talks about it in the recent Lex Fridman episode. I got the impression from him that he would have released it in a manner closer to that of open source if there wasn't a question of legal liability.

[IshKebab]

Why couldn't they distribute it? They clearly could have. There's no law against it.

Perhaps you meant that they were nervous about companies using it commercially and either bringing them bad press or making money off their work? That's clearly why they only released it for researchers.

[JumpCrisscross]

> Why couldn't they distribute it?

No legal issues per se. Hence the political qualifier. See: https://www.menendez.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/letter_to_meta...

[elcomet]

It was trained on data they don't own. They could face a lawsuit for this, like it has happened for image generation models.