|
|
|
|
|
by HWR_14
1096 days ago
|
|
Simpson's paradox is sometimes about spurious correlations, but the original paradox Simpson wrote about was simply a binary question with 84 subgroups, where 3 or 4 subgroups with the outlying answer just had a significant enough amount of all samples, and a significant enough effect, to mutate the whole. |
|