[haswell]

> We don’t often value experience because, you’re right, often times fresh eyes do bring useful insights.

This isn’t quite what I’m getting at. Even in an office environment, I bias towards valuing experience over naive and idealistic attempts to fix everything that’s wrong.

My point is closer to: those fresher experiences are ephemeral and also an important signal alongside deeper experience and institutional knowledge.

Office environments are also full of inexperienced people trying to fix systems they don’t understand.

My point is not that inexperienced people should be taking over, but that people in positions to institute change should be listening to newcomers along with seasoned veterans. I don’t see this as an either/or stance.